Comparison Results
(per unit)
Note: Simulation results are for reference only.
- Analysis days per month
- -days
- Analysis hours per day
- -hours
- Instrument currently used
- -
- CO2 emissions
- -kg/yr
- Power consumption
- -kWh/yr
-US$/yr
- Mobile phase consumption
- -L/yr
-US$/yr
- Labor required per mobile phase replacement
- -US$/yr
- Labor required per analysis
- -US$/yr
- Labor required for maintenance
- -US$/yr
- New model
- -
- CO2 emissions
- -kg/yr
- Power consumption
- -kWh/yr
-US$/yr
- Mobile phase consumption
- -L/yr
-US$/yr
- Labor required per mobile phase replacement
- -US$/yr
- Labor required per analysis
- -US$/yr
- Labor required for maintenance
- -US$/yr
Reduces CO2 emissions by-kg and saves about-US$ in running costs compared to the current model.
Comparison Assumptions
The following assumptions are used for simulation comparisons.
Differences between Nexera and Prominence UFLC XR
・Difference in electricity consumption: Less electricity is used.
Comparison results were calculated based on the following assumptions:
| Prominence UFLC XR | Nexera | |
|---|---|---|
| System Controller | CBM-20A | SCL-40 |
| Pump | Two LC-20AXR units | LC-40B XR w/ DGU-405 |
| Autosampler | SIL-20ACXR | SIL-40C XR |
| Plate Changer | RackChanger II | PCG |
| Column Oven | CTO-20AC | CTO-40S |
| UV Detector | SPD-20AV | SPD-40V |
| Column | ShimPack VP ODS 4.6x250 ID.5um |
ShimPack Septer C18 3.0x150 3um |
| Flowrate | 1.0mL/min | 0.7mL/min |
| Analysis Time | 30min | 11min |
Precautions for LC-2050 and LC-2010 Comparisons
Comparison results were calculated based on the following assumptions:
| LC-2010 | LC-2050 | |
|---|---|---|
| Column | ShimPack VP ODS 4.6x250 ID.5um |
ShimPack Septer C18 3.0x150 3um |
| Flowrate | 1.0mL/min | 0.7mL/min |
| Analysis Time | 30min | 11min |