Content overflows the browser. Try zooming out (Ctrl + −) to see the full page. PDF Download
Application News No. G302A Gas Chromatography An Examination of the Effects of High/Low Column Cooling Rates Using Nexis TM GC-2030 LAAN-A-GC-E067A Gas chromatography is a technique for separating components within a sample by utilizing the adsorption and desorption of components from a column when it is heated. The adsorption and desorption differ according to the column's liquid phase type. After analysis, the column must be cooled down to the initial temperature, but the rate at which the column is cooled may affect the column's liquid phase. Until now, priority was placed on shortening cooling times in order to shorten analysis cycles. However, the Nexis GC-2030 now allows operators to select a column cooling rate of their choice. By selecting the optimum cooling rate, the life time of the column can be maximized. This article compares the baseline noise and the S/N ratio of peaks according to different cooling rates when using the Nexis GC-2030 cooling program. A. Hashimoto Column Liquid Phase Fig. 1 shows the liquid phase model of a column coated with methyl phenyl polysiloxane. Each of the individual figures show the liquid phase structure in differing states: Fig. 1-1 at a high temperature, Fig. 1-2 at a low temperature, and Fig. 1-3 after rapid cooling. At a high temperature, molecular mobility is increased and the liquid phase expands whereas at a low temperature the molecular mobility is suppressed and the liquid phase contracts. If the temperature change from high to low is gradual, the liquid phase expands and contracts without damaging its structure. However, if the column oven is cooled rapidly, the liquid phase is damaged as shown in Fig. 1-3 in which side chains with a large molecular structure in the liquid phase polymer are cut off. The following sections study the affects of this damage on analysis results with respect to the stability and noise of the baseline and S/N ratios. Baselines Table 1 lists the gas chromatography (GC) analytical conditions used in this study and Fig. 2 shows the enlarged chromatogram of nine compounds. Using methanol as a solvent, a sample was prepared so that it contains the nine compounds indicated in Fig. 2 each at a concentration of 1 vol%. This sample solution was analyzed continuously 100 times using the analytical conditions listed in Table 1 with differing column cooling rates. Fig. 3 shows an enlarged view of the baseline of the 100th analysis with a low cooling rate (red line) and that with a high cooling rate (black line). Looking at Fig. 3, we can see that the noise of the baseline is greater with the high cooling rate compared to that with the low cooling rate. This is because side chains in the column's liquid phase are cut off when using a high cooling rate and those chains are detected when the column is heated the next time around. This result indicates that the cooling rate affects both the liquid phase of the column and the analysis results. Table 1 GC Analytical Conditions Model : Nexis GC-2030/AOC-20i Injection Mode : Split mode Injection Volume : 1.0 μL Split Ratio : 1:50 Injection Temp. : 250 °C Carrier Gas : He Carrier Gas Control : Constant linear velocity (30 cm/sec) Column : SH-50 (30 m × 0.32 mm I.D., 1.00 μm) *1 Column Temp. : 40 °C (0 min.) - 4 °C/min. - 280 °C (0 min.) Detector : FID Detector Temp. : 320 °C Detector Gas : He 32.0 mL/min, Air 200 mL/min Makeup Gas : He (24 mL/min) *1 P/N: 227-36167-01 Fig. 1 Model Diagrams of the Column Liquid Phase Fig. 1-1 Model of Liquid Phase Structure at High Temperature Fig. 1-2 Model of Liquid Phase Structure at Low Temperature Fig. 1-3 Model of Liquid Phase Structure After Rapid Cooling
Application News No. G302A www.shimadzu.com/an/ Shimadzu Corporation For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures. This publication may contain references to products that are not available in your country. Please contact us to check the availability of these products in your country. The content of this publication shall not be reproduced, altered or sold for any commercial purpose without the written approval of Shimadzu. See http://www.shimadzu.com/about/trademarks/index.html for details. Third party trademarks and trade names may be used in this publication to refer to either the entities or their products/services, whether or not they are used with trademark symbol “TM” or “”. Shimadzu disclaims any proprietary interest in trademarks and trade names other than its own. The information contained herein is provided to you "as is" without warranty of any kind including without limitation warranties as to its accuracy or completeness. Shimadzu does not assume any responsibility or liability for any damage, whether direct or indirect, relating to the use of this publication. This publication is based upon the information available to Shimadzu on or before the date of publication, and subject to change without notice. © Shimadzu Corporation, 2017 First Edition: May 2017 Revision A: Mar. 2023 Fig. 2 Enlarged Chromatogram of Nine Compounds Fig. 3 Enlarged View of Baselines from the 100th Analysis with a High Cooling Rate and with a Low Cooling Rate Table 2 Comparison of Noise and S/N Ratios Low Cooling Rate High Cooling Rate 5th 50th 100th 5th 50th 100th Noise 128 81 76 631 284 259 1 Acetone 252 403 390 31 68 73 2 n-Propanol 310 494 525 60 129 151 3 Ethyl Acetate 170 264 297 34 65 81 4 Isobutanol 409 653 695 83 178 204 5 Isoamyl Alcohol 179 289 304 36 80 90 6 Ethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether 270 430 460 55 120 136 7 Ethylbenzene 369 575 590 64 129 136 8 Ethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether 211 346 362 43 97 107 9 1,3-Dimethyl-2-Imidazolidinone 249 358 378 50 105 115 Baseline Noise and S/N Ratios Table 2 summarizes the baseline noise and the S/N ratios of the nine compounds from the 5th, 50th, and 100th analyses when using a fast cooling rate and when using a low cooling rate. The values in Table 2 indicate that the baseline noise is smaller and S/N ratios are higher when using a low cooling rate compared to when using a high cooling rate. When using a test method involving S/N ratios, using a low cooling rate is likely to be effective. Conclusion When performing analyses repeatedly on a gas chromatograph, the cooling conditions for the oven may affect the liquid phase of the column depending on its type. Until now, gas chromatographs were designed with an openable flap on the back side so that cooling times can be shortened and thereby shorten analysis times. The Nexis GC-2030 allows operators to select the optimum cooling rate for the column that is used. This can maximize the column performance over a long use period while also enabling the acquisition of favorable analysis results. 1. Acetone (Actn) 2. n-Propanol (nPrOH) 3. Ethyl Acetate (EtAc) 4. Isobutanol (iBuOH) 5. Isoamyl Alcohol (iAmOH) 6. Ethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether (Etcel) 7. Ethylbenzene (EtBz) 8. Ethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether (Bucel) 9. 1,3-Dimethyl-2-Imidazolidinone (DMI) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 27.5 30.0 32.5 min 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000 90000 uV 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 27.5 30.0 32.5 35.0 37.5 40.0 42.5 45.0 47.5 50.0 52.5 55.0 57.5 min 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 uV Low cooling rate High cooling rate
Please fill out the survey Related Products Some products may be updated to newer models. Nexis™ GC-2030 Gas Chromatograph SH-50 Related Solutions Electronics Environment Physical Testing Properties for Food Hydrocarbon Processing Industry (Petrochemical, Ch Small Molecule Pharmaceutical Life Science Soil Waste Material Price Inquiry Product Inquiry Technical Service / Support Inquiry Other Inquiry Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)