Application
News
www.shimadzu.com/an/
Shimadzu Corporation
© Shimadzu Corporation, 2023
For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.
This publication may contain references to products that are not available in your country. Please contact us to check the availability of these
products in your country.
The content of this publication shall not be reproduced, altered or sold for any commercial purpose without the written approval of Shimadzu.
See http://www.shimadzu.com/about/trademarks/index.html for details.
Third party trademarks and trade names may be used in this publication to refer to either the entities or their products/services, whether or not
they are used with trademark symbol “TM” or “”.
Shimadzu disclaims any proprietary interest in trademarks and trade names other than its own.
The information contained herein is provided to you "as is" without warranty of any kind including without limitation warranties as to its
accuracy or completeness. Shimadzu does not assume any responsibility or liability for any damage, whether direct or indirect, relating to the
use of this publication. This publication is based upon the information available to Shimadzu on or before the date of publication, and subject
to change without notice.
First Edition: Mar. 2023 01-00533-EN
found that the BARLEYmax cultivar has higher levels of three
key FOS compared to two other varieties, in accordance with
previous studies, and we mapped the distributions of these FOS
via MS images. The iMScope QT was shown to be a useful tool
for visual comparison of seed varieties.
Since the quantity of FOS in BARLEYmax is relatively high, it is
possible to visualize the distribution for each in the MS images
(Fig. 4). In each case, there is a noticeably lower concentration of
the FOS around the hypocotyl compared to the main body of
the seed. The slight striping effect is also present in the TIC
image and appears to be caused by the uneven sliced surface of
the seed.
For the other barley varieties, the lower signal intensity makes it
more difficult to map the FOS distributions, although in the case
of Hindmarch, kestose (m/z 503.16) is clearly concentrated in
the base around the hypocotyl. This can be seen to a lesser
extent in glutinous barley rice.
Conclusion
In this study we demonstrated the ability of the iMScope QT
mass imaging microscope to detect and map FOS compounds
in three different varieties of barley seeds. In particular, we
Acknowledgements
We here would like to express our sincere gratitude to Dr.
Haruko Hirose from the Material Analysis Research Center,
TEIJIN LIMITED, for her grate cooperation in preparing three
varieties of barley for this application news.
References
1) Teijin (Biolier), “BARLEYmax”,https://biolier.jp/en/barleymax,
accessed Jan 2023.
2) T. Tamiya et. al., 2020, “Mass spectrometry of BARLEYmax
fructooligosaccharidides”, Journal of Cereal Science 95 103068
iMScope, iMScope TRIO and iMLayer are trademarks of Shimadzu Corporation or its affiliated companies in Japan and/or other countries.
Fig. 4 MS images of BARLEYmax (A), glutinous barley rice (B) and Hindmarch (C), showing total ion count (TIC) images and the distribution of the three FOS peaks:
kestose (m/z 503.16), nystose (m/z 665.21) and fructosyl-nystose (m/z 827.26)
TIC m/z 503.16 m/z 827.26 m/z 665.21 Optical image
(A)
(B)
(C)