Content overflows the browser. Try zooming out (Ctrl + −) to see the full page. PDF Download
User Benefits Application News A GC-FID system, Nexis GC-2060 (Shimadzu Corporation) was employed in this work. The details of the system and analytical conditions for this analysis method are shown in Table 1. Fig. 1 Nexis GC-2060 with AOC-30i Instrumentation and Analysis Conditions The analysis of volatile substances and methanol in spirit drinks is essential for regulatory compliance, quality control and verification of product authenticity. Commission Regulation (EC) No 2870/2000 establishes Community reference methods to ensure harmonized results during official controls and in disputes; gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID) is the specified reference technique for quantifying key volatile congeners (aldehydes, higher alcohols, ethyl acetate) and methanol. 1 This application note describes a GC-FID method for these analytes on a Shimadzu Nexis GC-2060, implemented to comply with the Regulation’s requirements and suitable for routine and official-control testing across a range of spirit drink categories. This application note also evaluates Shimadzu Multi-Mode Injection Unit (MMI) operated in split/splitless mode to verify its performance to meet the requirements of the method. Introduction Nexis GC-2060 was validated for Commission Regulation (EC) No 2870/2000 for the official control of spirit drinks. Nexis GC-2060 provides excellent separation, high linearity, and low RSDs for reliable routine throughput. The Multi-Mode Injection Unit (MMI) demonstrated excellent performance to meet EC 2870/2000 criteria and significantly reduces maintenance-related downtime. The Analysis of Volatile Substances and Methanol in Spirit Drinks Using Nexis GC-2060 Elvi Horiyanto 1 , Chun Kiang Chua 1 , Cynthia Lahey 1 , Chisato Kanamori 2 , Sixu Li 2 Gas Chromatograph Nexis GC-2060 1 Shimadzu Asia Pacific 2 Shimadzu Corporation Standards Preparation Table 2 shows the list of congeners and internal standard analyzed in this work. Standard solutions A, B, C, D and E (to be used as or for the preparation of calibration solutions, checking resolution, QC Standard and internal standard spiking) were prepared in close accordance with EC 2870/2000. 1 All reagents were of analytical grade (purity ≥ 99 %), and ultrapure water was used throughout. A 40 % (v/v) ethanol solution was prepared by diluting absolute ethanol with water and served as the solvent for all standard solutions. During preparation, the mass of each component was recorded to ensure accurate quantification of unknown samples. Calibration solutions were prepared by combining appropriate volumes of Solutions A and B to obtain final concentrations of 30, 150, 300, and 600 µL/L, with internal standard concentration of 300 µL/L. The concentrations were subsequently recalculated to µg/g for construction of the internal standard calibration curve. QC Standard was prepared by combining 9:1 volume ratio of Solution D and E, resulting in a final concentration of 270 µL/L for each congener, with internal standard concentration of 300 µL/L. Standards and Sample Preparation System Configurations GC system Nexis GC-2060 Injection Port Multi-Mode Injection Unit (MMI) Auto sampler AOC-30i Column SH-BAC Plus 1; 30 m x 0.32 mm x 1.80 µm (P/N: 227-36260-01), SH-502.2; 30 m x 0.25 mm x 1.40 µm (P/N: 227-36341-04) Both columns are connected in series. AOC-30i Parameters Sample Volume 0.5 μL Gas Chromatograph Parameters Injection Mode Split mode (Split Ratio: 20) Carrier Gas Nitrogen Flow Control Mode Linear velocity (25 cm/s) Column Temperature Program 60 ˚C (5 min) → 10 ˚C/min to 80 ˚C (18 min) → 30 ˚C/min to 200 ˚C (9 min) FID Parameter Detector Temperature 240 ˚C Table 1. System Configurations and Analysis Conditions ID # Compound Name 1 Methanol 2 Acetaldehyde 3 Propan-1-ol 4 Butan-2-ol 5 2-Methylpropan-1-ol 6 Ethyl acetate 7 Butan-1-ol 8 Pentan-3-ol (IS) 9 Acetal 10 3-Methylbutan-1-ol 11 2-Methylbutan-1-ol Table 2. List of Congeners and Internal Standard (IS) Analyzed Sample Preparation For sample preparation, a measured volume of the spirit drink sample was transferred into a sealed vessel, followed by the addition of a fixed volume of Solution E. The mixture was homogenised by inversion and, if necessary, diluted with 40 % (v/v) ethanol to ensure analyte concentrations fell within the calibration range. Prepared samples should be analysed immediately to minimise the loss of volatile components. Results and Calculation Separation & Response Factor Chromatographic separation under the GC conditions produced clear and well-resolved peaks for all target analytes. MMI enables rapid cooling, reducing the temperature from 230˚C to 70˚C in 7 minutes, compared with 32.2 minutes for conventional SPL in this system. With the compressed air cooling option, MMI can reduce the cooling time further to just 2.4 minutes. Although cooling time may vary depending on the installation environment and air supply pressure, MMI still significantly shortens maintenance downtime compared with conventional SPL.
Application News Solution C was employed for the evaluation of chromatographic resolution and determination of response factors. EC 2870/2000 specifies a minimum resolution greater than 1.3, except for 2-methylbutan-1-ol/ 3-methylbutan-1-ol pair. The resolution obtained from Solution C meets this requirement, as shown in Table 3, satisfying the requirement of EC 2870/2000. No significant coelutions or unresolved interferences were observed for the regulated congeners. In cases of partial overlap between 2- and 3-methylbutan-1-ol, quantification was performed in accordance with the established and validated method protocol. Response factors (RFs) for the congeners were calculated and applied for subsequent sample quantification using the following equation stated in EC 2870/2000,   ()=   × .  (µ/) .  (µ/) Where: A = Peak Area IS = Internal Standard Figure 2 shows the chromatogram obtained from Solution C, while Table 3 summarizes the retention times, chromatographic resolution values between adjacent peaks, and response factors for all congeners based on Solution C. Calibration Curves and LOQ Internal standard calibration curves for individual congeners were established by linear regression analysis of the analyte-to- internal standard (IS) peak area ratio as a function of the corresponding concentration ratio. All target analytes demonstrated excellent linearity across the calibration range, with correlation coefficients (R²) of ≥0.9994. These values meet the requirements of EC 2870/2000, which specify R² ≥ 0.99. Calibration curves for all congeners are shown in Figure 3. ID # Compound Name Retention Time (min) Resolution Response Factor (RF) 1 Methanol 7.100 1.3 2.117 2 Acetaldehyde 7.535 3.5 2.052 3 Propan-1-ol 10.712 18.1 1.152 4 Butan-2-ol 12.453 12.7 1.101 5 2-Methylpropan-1-ol 13.560 7.7 0.971 6 Ethyl acetate 13.861 2.1 1.742 7 Butan-1-ol 15.617 11.8 1.041 8 Pentan-3-ol (IS) 18.323 15.6 1.000 9 Acetal 19.992 8.4 1.398 10 3-Methylbutan-1-ol 21.477 4.0 0.951 11 2-Methylbutan-1-ol 21.720 1.1 0.901 Table 3. Retention Time, Resolution and Response Factor of Each Congener Based on Solution C Fig. 2. Chromatogram of Standard Solution C Fig. 3. Calibration Curve (Internal Standard Method) for Each Congener ID # Compound Name R 2 Practical LOQ (µg/g) S/N at LOQ 1 Methanol 1.0000 11.1 16.72 2 Acetaldehyde 0.9999 4.5 12.48 3 Propan-1-ol 1.0000 5.5 13.01 4 Butan-2-ol 1.0000 5.6 15.31 5 2-Methylpropan-1-ol 1.0000 5.6 15.30 6 Ethyl acetate 0.9994 6.3 14.28 7 Butan-1-ol 0.9999 5.6 11.22 8 Pentan-3-ol (IS) - - - 9 Acetal 0.9998 11.4 15.24 10 3-Methylbutan-1-ol 0.9999 5.6 10.09 11 2-Methylbutan-1-ol 1.0000 5.7 10.93 Table 4. Summary of R 2 Values, Practical LOQ and S/N at LOQ Concentration Repeatability (Low and Mid Calib. Points) Repeatability was assessed at two concentration levels, a low calibration point near the LOQ (12 µL/L) and a mid-range calibration point (300 µL/L), using seven replicate injections per level. Figure 4 shows the overlay chromatograms for the 7 repeated injections of 12 µL/L mixture. For each analyte, within-run standard deviation and %RSD were calculated and are presented in Table 5. Observed %RSD values met the laboratory repeatability targets and were better than the repeatability expectations referenced in the Regulation for similar sample matrices; all congeners exhibited %RSD ≤ 6% at the low-level and ≤ 1% precision at the mid-level calibration standard. Split injection mode in MMI showed extremely good repeatability under routine conditions. Methanol Acetaldehyde Propan-1-ol Butan-2-ol 2-Methylpropan-1-ol Butan-1-ol Ethyl acetate Acetal 2-methylbutan-1-ol 3-methylbutan-1-ol Table 5. Table of Standard Deviation and Concentration %RSD of Each Congener at Low- and Mid-level Calibration Points (n=7) ID # Compound Name ~12 µL/L ~300 µL/L SD %RSD SD %RSD 1 Methanol 0.0011 5.2 0.0021 0.4 2 Acetaldehyde 0.0003 1.7 0.0015 0.4 3 Propan-1-ol 0.0007 2.3 0.0031 0.4 4 Butan-2-ol 0.0003 0.8 0.0026 0.3 5 2-Methylpropan-1-ol 0.0006 1.6 0.0024 0.2 6 Ethyl acetate 0.0008 2.6 0.0053 0.9 7 Butan-1-ol 0.0005 1.6 0.0022 0.2 8 Pentan-3-ol (IS) 9 Acetal 0.0007 2.7 0.0044 0.8 10 3-Methylbutan-1-ol 0.0006 1.5 0.0035 0.3 11 2-Methylbutan-1-ol 0.0014 3.4 0.0059 0.5 The limit of quantitation (LOQ) was determined practically by identifying the lowest concentration of congeners with signal- to-noise ratio (S/N) >10. The R² values, practical LOQs, and S/N at LOQ for each congener are summarized in Table 4. 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Conc. Ratio 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 Area Ratio 0.0 0.5 1.0 Conc. Ratio 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 Area Ratio 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Conc. Ratio 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 Area Ratio 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Conc. Ratio 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 Area Ratio 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Conc. Ratio 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Area Ratio 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Conc. Ratio 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 Area Ratio 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Conc. Ratio 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 Area Ratio 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Conc. Ratio 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 Area Ratio 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Conc. Ratio 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Area Ratio 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Conc. Ratio 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Area Ratio ID#1 - Methanol ID#2 - Acetaldehyde ID#4 – Butan-2-ol ID#5 – 2-Methylpropan-1-ol ID#6 – Ethyl acetate ID#7 – Butan-1-ol ID#8 – Pentan-3-ol (IS) ID#10 – 3-Methylbutan-1-ol ID#11 – 2-Methylbutan-1-ol ID#9 – Acetal ID#3 – Propan-1-ol
Application News www.shimadzu.com/an/ Shimadzu Corporation Copyright © 2026 Shimadzu Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures. This publication may contain references to products that are not available in your country. Please contact us to check the availability of these products in your country. The content of this publication shall not be reproduced, altered or sold for any commercial purpose without the written approval of Shimadzu. See http://www.shimadzu.com/about/trademarks/index.html for details. Third party trademarks and trade names may be used in this publication to refer to either the entities or their products/services, whether or not they are used with trademark symbol “TM” or “”. Shimadzu disclaims any proprietary interest in trademarks and trade names other than its own. The information contained herein is provided to you "as is" without warranty of any kind including without limitation warranties as to its accuracy or completeness. Shimadzu does not assume any responsibility or liability for any damage, whether direct or indirect, relating to the use of this publication. This publication is based upon the information available to Shimadzu on or before the date of publication, and subject to change without notice. SHIMADZU (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd, www.shimadzu.com.sg 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 23.0 min 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 uV Data7:0319-038_Std Cal 2_12ppmv_Rep7_032.gcd FID1 Data6:0319-037_Std Cal 2_12ppmv_Rep6_031.gcd FID1 Data5:0319-036_Std Cal 2_12ppmv_Rep5_030.gcd FID1 Data4:0319-035_Std Cal 2_12ppmv_Rep4_029.gcd FID1 Data3:0319-034_Std Cal 2_12ppmv_Rep3_028.gcd FID1 Data2:0319-033_Std Cal 2_12ppmv_Rep2_027.gcd FID1 Data1:0319-032_Std Cal 2_12ppmv_Rep1_026.gcd FID1 First Edition: Jul 2026 04-AD-318-EN Nexis is a trademark of Shimadzu Corporation or its affiliated companies in Japan and/or other countries. Table 7. QC injection percent recoveries at defined points throughout the analytical sequence ID # Compound Name % Recovery QC-1* QC-2* QC-3* QC-4* 1 Methanol 99 97 98 97 2 Acetaldehyde 94 94 96 96 3 Propan-1-ol 97 98 98 98 4 Butan-2-ol 97 96 98 98 5 2-Methylpropan-1-ol 98 97 98 98 6 Ethyl acetate 90 93 92 92 7 Butan-1-ol 98 97 97 98 8 Pentan-3-ol (IS) 9 Acetal 94 95 95 95 10 3-Methylbutan-1-ol 98 98 97 98 11 2-Methylbutan-1-ol 98 99 98 98 Liquor Samples Quantitation Four different spirit drinks (brandy, whiskey, gin, and vodka) were analyzed and quantified. Concentrations of the liquor samples were calculated using the following equation stated in EC 2870/2000, .  (µ/)= A   × + ()  () × .  (µ/)×  Where: A = Peak Area M = Weight RF = Response Factor The calculated concentrations were expressed in µg analyte per g sample using the measured peak areas, internal standard and response factors. The results were converted to g per 100 L of absolute alcohol using the measured alcoholic strength and density, following the equation defined in EC 2870/2000,  =   (µ/)× × 10  %  × 1000 Where: ρ= density in kg/m 3 Results for all analyzed spirit drinks are provided in Table 6, with values flagged if below LOQ. Results exceeded relevant regulatory thresholds were also highlighted. Table 6. Final Reporting Results of All Liquor Samples in Terms of Gram per 100 L of Absolute Alcohol ID# Compound Name Concentration of in Spirit Drinks (g/100L) Brandy Whiskey Gin Vodka 1 Methanol 37.0 7.09 <LOQ 71.9 2 Acetaldehyde 18.0 10.9 N.D. N.D. 3 Propan-1-ol 31.4 72.2 <LOQ 2.80 4 Butan-2-ol N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 5 2-Methylpropan-1-ol 123 74.1 N.D. N.D. 6 Ethyl acetate 48.0 34.3 N.D. N.D. 7 Butan-1-ol N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 8 Pentan-3-ol (IS) 9 Acetal 9.8 10.6 N.D. 2.50 10 3-Methylbutan-1-ol 260 28.7 N.D. N.D. 11 2-Methylbutan-1-ol 66.3 7.09 N.D. N.D. In conclusion, analysis of volatile substances and methanol in spirit drinks using the Shimadzu Nexis GC-2060 produced robust chromatographic separation, an excellent linear detector response (R² ≥ 0.9994), and very good repeatability (≤ 6.0% RSD at low and ≤ 1% RSD at mid calibration points). Expected concentrations of QC standard were within ±10%, meeting the requirements of EC 2870/2000. The Shimadzu Multi-Mode Injection Unit (MMI), evaluated in split/splitless mode, delivered high injection precision and sensitivity and satisfied EC 2870/2000 criteria. Therefore, the MMI can be adopted for routine use since regular calibration, QC checks and repeatability criteria are met. Conclusions the analysis could proceed. As the QC results in this study met the criteria, the analytical performance was deemed acceptable, and the reported concentrations for the unknown samples were therefore considered valid. The individual QC injection percent recoveries are summarized in Table 7. *Where: QC-1: start of batch; QC-2: after calibration curve and before repeatability injection; QC-3: after repeatability injection; QC-4: after repeatability injection and before unknown sample analysis 1. Commission Regulation (EC) No 2870/2000 of 19 December 2000 laying down Community reference methods for the analysis of spirits drinks. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 333, 20–46. https ://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX :32000R2870 Reference QC Standard Recoveries QC standard was analyzed at the beginning of each analytical batch and at regular intervals thereafter (approximately one QC injection every ten samples) to monitor analytical stability. The concentration of each congener (.  in µ/) were calculated in the same manner as the unknown sample with the above equation. If the concentrations of all congeners in the QC solution were within ±10% of the expected concentrations, Fig. 4. Overlay Chromatograms for the 7 Repeated Injections of 12 μL/L of Standard Mixture During the Concentration Repeatability study.
Please fill out the survey Related Products Some products may be updated to newer models. Nexis GC-2060 Gas Chromatograph AOC-30 Series Autoinjector / Autosampler Related Solutions Food and Beverages Flavor Analysis Food Fraud Price Inquiry Product Inquiry Technical Service / Support Inquiry Other Inquiry