Application
News
www.shimadzu.com/an/
Shimadzu Corporation
© Shimadzu Corporation, 2026
For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.
This publication may contain references to products that are not available in your country. Please contact us to check the availability of these
products in your country.
The content of this publication shall not be reproduced, altered or sold for any commercial purpose without the written approval of Shimadzu.
See https://www.shimadzu.com/about/trademarks/index.html for details.
Third party trademarks and trade names may be used in this publication to refer to either the entities or their products/services, whether or not
they are used with trademark symbol “TM” or “”.
Shimadzu disclaims any proprietary interest in trademarks and trade names other than its own.
The information contained herein is provided to you "as is" without warranty of any kind including without limitation warranties as to its
accuracy or completeness. Shimadzu does not assume any responsibility or liability for any damage, whether direct or indirect, relating to the
use of this publication. This publication is based upon the information available to Shimadzu on or before the date of publication, and subject
to change without notice.
IRTracer and AIRsight are trademarks of Shimadzu Corporation or its affiliated companies in Japan and/or other countries.
Conclusions
An AIRsight infrared Raman microscope was used to perform
mapping analysis of a multilayer film used in food packaging.
Raman depth-profiling offered a simple and effective technique
for analyzing the film without the need for sample preparation.
A cross-section of the film was also prepared with a microtome,
and Raman spectroscopy of it was used in conjunction with
depth-profiling data for a more accurate analysis of the film
material. Infrared spectroscopic analysis was also performed on
the same part of the cross-sectional sample, allowing for a more
multifaceted assessment of the film. Many of the plastics used in
multilayer films emit fluorescent light, making infrared
spectroscopy more effective than Raman spectroscopy at
analyzing them.
The AIRsight can easily switch between infrared and Raman
spectroscopy, and it can use readings from mapping analysis to
create chemical images that show the distribution of
constituent materials. The ability to quickly characterize the
structure of multilayer films and assess them with different
techniques will help accelerate the development of new
functional materials and with the necessary quality controls.
<References>
1) Job M Belle, David L. Stokes, and Tuan. Vo-Dinh,
“Correspondence. Direct Characterization of the Phtalic Acid
Isomers in Mixtures Using Surface-Enhanced Raman
Scattering”, Analytical Chemistry, 62, 1349 (1990)
<Related Application News Articles>
1. Multilayer Film Analysis Using the AIRsight Infrared Raman
Microscope Application News No. 01-00465
First and fifth layers: PET
Second and fourth layers: Nylon
Third layer: PP
Depth-Profiling by Raman Spectroscopy
Depth-profiling by Raman spectroscopy does not require the
preparation of a cross-sectional sample. This eliminates the time
and equipment required for sample preparation, and it allows
for quicker analysis.
A 100x objective lens was used to analyze the same multilayer
film in the above cross-sectional analysis. The laser spot size was
3 µm in diameter, and the depth resolution was 7.5 µm. The
horizontal step size was 10 µm, and the depth step size was
3 µm. The mapping area was (W) 140 × (H) 150µm. Mapping
analysis of this large area was completed in just 20 minutes.
Fig. 7 shows the chemical images created from the Raman
mapping data. Depth-profiling analysis detected another PET
layer. This fifth layer is believed to have been lost when the
microtome was used to prepare the sample for cross-sectional
analysis.
Depth-profiling analysis also detected an alkyd resin peak at
around 1000 cm
-1
, as was detected during cross-sectional analysis
by Raman spectroscopy (Fig. 8).
1)
However, the Raman depth-
profiling analysis only detected this peak between the first and
second layers and the second and third layers. It did not detect it
between other layers. This is probably because Raman depth-
profiling has a higher spatial resolution in the lateral direction,
rather than in the depth direction, making detection of the thin
alkyd resin layer difficult. The resolution of Raman depth-profiling
also decreases with increasing depth due to factors such as
scattering, which also probably affected the results.
Fig. 9 shows the laminate structure of the film based on the
results of depth-profiling analysis by Raman spectroscopy.
Unlike cross-sectional analysis, Raman depth-profiling analysis
provided these results without the need for sample preparation.
Cross-sectional analysis can also be used in conjunction with
depth-profiling analysis for a more detailed discussion of certain
aspects of the analyzed film.
PET
Nylon
PP
Nylon
PET
Alkyd
Fig. 9 Laminate Structure of Film Based on Depth-Profiling Analysis
by Raman Spectroscopy
Fig. 7 Depth-Profiling by Raman Spectroscopy:
Raman Spectrum and Chemical Image of Each Layer
Alkyd resin
Fig. 8 Depth-Profiling by Raman Spectroscopy
Raman Spectrum and Chemical Image of Boundary Region
between First and Second Layers
We are sincerely grateful to Hayato Nakajima of the Institute for
Chemical Research at Kyoto University for assisting us in preparing
this article.
Alkyd resin
PET
Similarity to
reference spectrum
High Low
Peak height
at 1020–980 cm
-1
High Low
Line axis
Depth
Line axis
Depth
Line axis
Depth
Line axis
Depth
First Edition: Apr. 2026 01-01111-EN