Application
News
The LCMS-8060RX was used as the mass spectrometer.
CoreSpray, adopted in the LCMS-8060RX, achieves stable
ionization by further improving nebulizer flow uniformity and
extending the upper flowrate limit to 7 L/min. Consistent ion
injection reduces variation within the same sample and
between instruments (Fig. 4).
The Nexera X4 LC unit used, provides highly consistent solvent
delivery during gradient analysis and demonstrates excellent
retention time repeatability even in ultra-high-speed analysis.
That significantly increases analysis speed while maintaining
analytical quality equivalent to conventional HPLC.
The analysis time for this method, including column
equilibration, is 0.80 min, enabling rapid processing of a huge
number of samples. Furthermore, the Nexera X4 features tool-
less fittings (Fig. 5) for column connections, allowing simple and
reliable column replacement even for ultra-high pressure
analysis.
Compound
Retention
time (min)
Standard
deviation of
retention time
(sec)
Area %RSD
Resorufin 0.399 0.010 2.54
4’-Hydroxydiclofenac 0.432 0.011 2.38
Oxidized Nifedipine 0.451 0.013 1.74
6-Hydroxychlorzoxazone 0.391 0.012 1.96
7-Hydroxycoumarin 0.399 0.010 1.65
Hydroxy Tolbutamide 0.400 0.012 2.28
Evaluation of Retention Time and Peak Area
Repeatability
A 10 nmol/L standard sample was analyzed six times using the
indicated method to evaluate the repeatability of retention times
and peak areas.
The standard deviation of retention times was 0.010 to 0.013 sec,
and the relative standard deviation of peak area was 3.0 % or less,
confirming that sufficient analytical consistency was maintained
even under high-speed gradient conditions.
Results for Standard Samples
Calibration standards were prepared over the range of 0.01 to
200 nmol/L, and linearity was confirmed from the results of six
repeated analyses. The calibration range and coefficients of
determination are summarized in Table 4, and representative
chromatograms are shown in Fig. 6.
The results showed good linearity for all compounds, with R
2
>
0.995 within the specified concentration range. All calibration
points satisfied the criteria of accuracy within 80–120 % and
precision within 20 % RSD for concentration.
Compound
Quantification Range
(nmol/L)
Coefficient of
Determination
R
2
Resorufin 0.5 – 100 0.999
4’-Hydroxydiclofenac 0.1 – 200 0.996
Oxidized Nifedipine 0.01 – 50 0.999
6-Hydroxychlorzoxazone 0.5 – 200 0.995
7-Hydroxycoumarin 0.5 – 100 0.995
Hydroxy Tolbutamide 0.05 – 200 0.997
8.91e4 Q 214.10>186.10 (+)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6
0.0e0
2.0e4
4.0e4
6.0e4
8.0e4
3.61e4 Q 184.00>64.05 (-)
0.2 0.4 0.6
0.0e0
1.0e4
2.0e4
3.0e4
2.60e5 Q 312.00>230.10 (+)
0.2 0.4 0.6
0.0e0
5.0e4
1.0e5
1.5e5
2.0e5
2.5e5
7.86e4 Q 161.00>133.10 (-)
0.2 0.4 0.6
0.0e0
2.0e4
4.0e4
6.0e4
2.86e6 Q 345.10>284.10 (+)
0.2 0.4 0.6
0.0e0
5.0e5
1.0e6
1.5e6
2.0e6
2.5e6
5.09e5 Q 285.10>186.00 (-)
0.2 0.4 0.6
0.0e0
1.0e5
2.0e5
3.0e5
4.0e5
5.0e5
1.16e3 Q 312.00>230.10 (+)
0.2 0.4 0.6
0.0e0
2.0e3
4.0e3
6.0e3
7.78e2 Q 345.10>284.10 (+)
0.2 0.4 0.6
0.0e0
1.0e3
2.0e3
3.0e3
4.0e3
2.39e2 Q 161.00>133.10 (-)
0.2 0.4 0.6
0.0e0
2.0e2
4.0e2
6.0e2
8.0e2
1.04e6 Q 312.00>230.10 (+)
0.2 0.4 0.6
0.0e0
2.0e5
4.0e5
6.0e5
8.0e5
1.0e6
1.03e7 Q 345.10>284.10 (+)
0.2 0.4 0.6
0.0e0
2.0e6
4.0e6
6.0e6
8.0e6
1.0e7
6.01e5 Q 161.00>133.10 (-)
0.2 0.4 0.6
0.0e0
1.0e5
2.0e5
3.0e5
4.0e5
5.0e5
6.0e5
Resorufin 6-Hydroxychlorzoxazone
Oxidized Nifedipine
4’-Hydroxydiclofenac 7-Hydroxycoumarin
Hydroxy Tolbutamide
Oxidized Nifedipine
4’-Hydroxydiclofenac
7-Hydroxycoumarin
Unspiked Substrate-spiked
Unspiked Substrate-spiked
Unspiked Substrate-spicked
Results for CYP-Metabolized Samples
Using the same method, samples after CYP-mediated metabolic
reactions were analyzed. As shown in the chromatograms in Fig. 7,
no interfering peaks were observed in the unspiked sample
solution, while the target metabolites (4’-hydroxydiclofenac,
oxidized nifedipine, and 7-hydroxycoumarin) were detected with
good peak shapes in the substrate-spiked sample solution.
Fig. 4 CoreSpray Injection in the LCMS-8060RX
Fig. 5 Tool-less Fittings in Nexera X4 System
Table 3 Evaluation of Retention Time and Peak Area Repeatability (n = 6)
Table 4 Calibration Summary Table
Fig. 6 Representative Chromatograms (10 nmol/L)
Fig. 7 Chromatograms of CYP-Metabolized Samples